In an increasingly unstable global context, the U.S. Federal Reserve (FED) faces...
Forecasts for the Fed's Decision Amid Trade Wars and Geopolitical Conflicts
In an increasingly unstable global context, the U.S. Federal Reserve (FED) faces crucial monetary policy decisions with incredibly high stakes. The combination of trade wars, geopolitical tensions, and signs of domestic fiscal weakness has raised alarm bells—not just for the U.S. economy, but for the global financial system as a whole.
At present, the FED maintains interest rates in the 4.25%–4.50% range, with a policy aimed at stabilizing inflation around the 2% target while safeguarding economic growth. Signs of a slowdown in job creation and a slight contraction in credit suggest possible rate cuts by late 2025 or early 2026.
Donald Trump’s current administration has ramped up personal attacks on Jerome Powell, the Fed Chair—originally appointed by Trump and in office until May 2026. Trump has called Powell a “numbskull,” “Señor Too Late,” and even suggested that his removal for “fraud” related to the cost of the Fed’s building renovation could be justified.
During a visit to the building under renovation, Trump criticized the estimated $3.1 billion cost. Powell, speaking from the same location, refuted the claims as inaccurate and based on faulty calculations. Key administration figures, including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought, have pushed for an internal review, hinting that excessive costs might warrant removal “for cause.”

Although stating he has no “immediate intention to fire Powell,” Trump has reportedly sought advice from Republican senators on possible early dismissal strategies and has considered Kevin Hassett as a potential replacement. Powell, however, remains firm in asserting that legal removal is only possible “for cause,” not for disagreements over monetary policy—a stance backed by legal and institutional experts.
The tariff-driven policies of the Trump administration have reignited a wave of trade wars, especially with China. These tensions have disrupted global supply chains, increased production costs, and fueled domestic inflationary pressures.
For the Fed, this scenario presents a paradox: on one hand, trade wars stifle growth; on the other, they drive up imported inflation. The result is a monetary policy caught between two fires—sluggish growth and rising prices.
The geopolitical landscape is marked by widespread instability: the war in Ukraine, the crisis in Gaza, rising tensions in the Taiwan Strait, and global rearmament have all contributed to a climate of permanent uncertainty. These conflicts erode international investor confidence, drive up commodity prices (especially energy), and force governments to increase military spending.
For the Fed, this means operating in an environment where volatility is the new normal, making it far more complex to predict the effects of its policy decisions.
U.S. sovereign debt has reached around $36 trillion, with the debt-to-GDP ratio continuing to climb. On May 16, 2025, Moody’s downgraded the U.S. credit rating from Aaa to Aa1, citing rising structural deficits, high interest costs, and a lack of corrective fiscal policy.
Moody’s projects that federal debt could reach 134% of GDP by 2035, with annual deficits between 7% and 9% of GDP in the coming years. Nonetheless, the agency has maintained a “stable” outlook, noting that the U.S. still retains strong macroeconomic fundamentals.

A U.S. sovereign debt crisis would be unprecedented. The global economy hinges on the stability of the U.S. dollar and the solvency of the Treasury. Even a technical or temporary default would trigger:
A collapse in global financial markets
A flight of capital to safe-haven assets (gold, Swiss franc, real estate)
A crisis in the international banking system
A loss of financing capacity for other nations
This scenario, while remote, is not impossible. That’s why the Fed is walking a tightrope: supporting the economy without exacerbating debt, maintaining confidence without sacrificing growth.
The Fed’s next decision will be one of the most difficult in decades. With inflationary pressures fueled by trade and geopolitical tensions, friction with the executive branch, and debt vulnerabilities, every move will be scrutinized.
More than ever, global financial stability depends on the Fed’s ability to remain independent, rational, and transparent. As Powell himself stated: “Our mission is not to respond to politics, but to serve the American people.”